Debunker

[Greta]

Usually, a self claimed internet residing know it all who claims to have the knowledge to flop what he/she perceives as a conspiracy theory on its head. This is often a means for showing off. The complete opposite of a hardcore conspiracy theorist, debunkers usually have little common sense, little or no ability to connect the dots, no respect for common sense and call everything that that is outside their narrow a conspiracy theory. Since they profess to rely on [hard evidence] so much, this often seeps out of the domain of hard evidence, and they begin to fabricate so called truths based primarily on [jumping to conclusions] and ad hominem attacks. Their favorite tactic is to try to get something out of the way by attempting to embarrass their opponent and call it a done deal.

The other type of debunker consists of those who are [anti-establishment] and attempt to expose mainstream fraud and nonsense for what it is using logic, anecdotal evidence, and supplemental facts and figures. They are commonly insulted with the term conspiracy theorist by those who wish to tarnish their reputations. Although still [fallible], anti-establishment debunkers commonly have less of an emotional stake in their arguments, as they have seen the light far more than their naive counterparts. Some do, however, take this too far and become truly raving lunatics.

[Jason Yan]

A person who exposes the falseness of an idea or belief.

[Couch Potatoe]

An individual, usually a scientist with a PhD or someone with expertise in their field of work. Whom analyzes the information, facts, and available data [salvaged] from a controversial point in time which many Conspiracy Nuts have labeled an [Inside Job].
These people [corroborate] their information, and then construct the most likely scenario that occurred on the day of the controversial event. Usually Debunking wild, pseudo-factual conspiracy theories.