Double standard
-
When a situation is desireable for one group but deplorable for another. Typically used in reasons to support feminists [feminazi], but completely ignoring the terrible double standard favoring them.
-
Mathematically speaking, the obnoxious idea that its OK for 56 to insult 82, but its NOT OK for 82 to insult 56. Of course, 56 and 82 can be replaced with many different races, religions, etc.
-
A concept that permits and excuses certain behaviors and actions from one group but violently opposes the same actions from another.
For example.
A bitchy self serving controlling female who steps all over men and uses them for her own selfish benefits is considered a STRONG WOMAN.
But
A self serving controlling man who steps all over women and uses them for his own selfish benefits is considered a MALE CHAUVINIST PIG.
A black comedian whose entire act is poking fun at the way white people talk, walk, dress, dance, -
-
Anything which is okay for a particular group of humans to engage in but completely unacceptable if another particular group indulges in it.
-
Applying different sets of rules to the same principals especially when they are both equally as bad
-
Being unfair with others yet enabling certain people to do what you didnt let the others do.
For example, you have a bowl of chips that everyone can eat from but you dont allow certain people at the party to have the chips.
Double Standards can also apply to genders. Like, its not weird to see a woman wearing mens clothing but its very odd to see a man wearing womens clothing. So double standards come in different circumstances.
-
When two groups are judged against different standards. The most commonly cited example: a promiscuous man is a player/pimp but a promiscuous woman is a slut/ho.
-
The practice by females of using female sex as a disability instead of doing the right thing and litigating for the responsibility of [selective service].
There are more lesbians in the state of Florida litigating for the responsibility of adoptive motherhood than there are women throughout the United States litigating for the responsibility of selective service.
Males cannot challenge the [constitutionality] of all-male selective service because they cannot specificially request in their lawsuit a particular ruling that changes military policy.
Women will try to use every bullshit argument when confronted with their own selfishness. Some women have the nerve to call selective service an artifact, saying it was used as far back as 1973. Archeologists do not look for artifacts from 34 years ago and the penalties for non-compliance with selective service registration will be enforced for the forseeable future.
Women will try to say that women do not owe men anything despite:the fact that mostly male politicians [ratified] [the 19th Amendment],
gave women [Title IX] (which eviscerated mens sports, contrary to what that cunt Donna Lopiano would like you to believe),
refused (in 15 states, most notably Illinois) to [ratify] the Equal Rights Amendment because women [balked] (again, most notably in Illinois) at losing their [free ride] during wartime,
made sure that women would be paid the same amount of money for doing the same work as a similar man (so a woman who has never been married and has no kids would make as much money as a man who has also never been married and has no kids)
and 5) legalized no-fault divorce, most of which are initiated by women for spurious reasons, leading to men with almost no custody of their children and whorebag, I mean, ex-wife, I mean child support payments that the ex-wife can spend on an SUV despite having children who will not get their [learners] permits for a decade.
Womens refusal to demand responsibilities is indicative of how immoral feminism is in the United States. There is nothing communist or fascist or unpatriotic about feeling that responsibilities should apply to everybody.
Explore More Definitions
Browse our collection of 300,000+ community-written definitions