Technocracy

[Jason Yan]

Technocracy, the politico-economic movement, advocates the [optimization] of the welfare of human beings, by means of scientific analyses and engineered action. It does not limit itself to established economic, political and administrative forms, but considers those as human artifacts subject to optimization. As a result, [the groups] reforms seem quite radical to many people.
Technocracy advocates an [economic system] in which production is run at full capacity at all times, and purchasing power equal to the productive capacity is evenly distributed to all. The organization claims that this will guarantee both well-being and security for all.

[Little_Girl]

A form of government where those who are skilled rule.
“Those who are skilled” is often taken to mean scientist and engineers; however, that is not necessarily the case. A [technocracy] is a hypothetical system of [governance] where those who are skilled in a particular area make the decisions for that area, so a person who is skilled in the area of health would manage [the heath] system and someone skilled in defence would make the decisions for the defence of a state rather than having elected representatives make the decisions.
[Technocracy] can also be seen as a plan for society where the technical aspects of society are run by those who are skilled in those areas. The plan would see the replacement of capitalism, money and the [free market] with a more rational means of allocating and managing the resources of society to maintain a high standard of living for the longest time possible.

[Jessica]

The new system to replace the current price system.
The main problem is that the price does not reflect the actual cost of the product. It may be higher when the product is [scarce], and lower when its abundant, while the effort of producing it is still the same. Thats why [technocracy] introduces new valuating system which is based on so called energy-credits. The products and services are valued by the amount of energy it takes to create it. That includes the energy used to get [raw materials], for manufacturing, transport, distribution and [recycling] [the leftovers]. In this case the cost of the product would not [fluctuate] and decrease when new more energy-efficient methods of manufacturing/transport/recycling methods are implemented.
The first point is that nowadays economy is already obsolete and causes lots of problems. The industry power is such great today, that when its run on full [scale it] can produce abundance. But we have warehouses of food destroyed to keep food prices high while there are millions starving.
Another point is that currently industry is so [automated], that there is little need for human labour to produce goods. This ends up in unemployment and creating unnecessary jobs, while few enjoy great wealth just because they own the machines.
The main idea of technocracy is:

change product and service valuating from price system to energy-accounting

calculate the total ammount of energy the country (most likely continent) can get, dedicate part of it for maintenance of Technate (technocratic society) and the rest divide equally among all citizens. At the end of [the balance] period (24 hours, week or month) all energy-credits are [zeroed] and calculated anew. Also the supply of particular products are modified to meet the demand a little surplus.

using technology to create abundance for all people. That means to use technology to automate industry as much as possible, run the manufacturing machinery as much as to meet [populations] demands for products, develop synthetic analogue materials for scarce non-renewable raw materials, use recycling to get raw materials (the [cyclic] consumption), reduce waste to minimum and find new ways of getting unlimited ammounts of energy.

There are requirements to establish technocracy:

continent with all kinds of raw materials and vast energy resources
continent with enough technology and [means of production] to create abundance
experts and scientists to run the technology

In technocracy the money-related crime will [perish] (95% of all crime), competition and stress removed, energy-credits is not subject to theft, gamble, [hoarding], bribe, transfer, debt or interest. Because all the people get their personal (no one else can yous your energy-credits) equal part every [new balance] period, and this ammount is enough for abundance (most cases you wont spend half of it). It doesnt matter if you work or not, you get it as a right of citizenship.
In technocracy you will only have to work about 160 days a year, 4 hours a day, 4 days a week (ant thats according to calculations made in [1930]), as the time goes the need for work will decrease even more.
Also, technocracy proposes new inhabitation form, called [Urbanate]. Big cities are very [inefficient] and lowers [quality of life]. Urbanates are specially designed towns of 20000 citizens. No traffic jams, polution, density, crime (typical in dense populations). The houses built of sound-proof durable materials with all the hi-tech installation (from humidity control to automated lighting systems).
In short:
Small size (perhaps 20,000-100,000 people)
Planned, top-down design
Pre-installed, integrated transportation, [utilities], and communications
Safe, pollution free environment
Thats only a small part (a few main points) of technocracy.
Some people might find it similar to communism, but this is not correct. [Technocracy] is non-political (democratic controls on non-technical issues and decisions). Its not from everyone according to his abilities and to everyone according to his needs. Its abundance to everyone.

[Donald Trump]

1. The bureaucratic [management] of technology.
2. A technology administered by non-qualified staff members.
3. A mis-managed [technical] program.
4. A secret organization [devoted] to technical mis-management.

[Michiko]

The government or control of society or industry by an elite of technical experts.

[PussyCat]

a government or social system that is controlled or influenced by experts in science or technology; the fact of a government or social system being influenced by such experts :